Connecting...

Blog Img

EPCM vs EPC Delivery Models: What’s Changing in Australia’s Mining Sector and What it Means for Hiring

Back to Blogs

As Australia’s mining industry continues to evolve, so too do the ways projects are delivered. Over the past few years, we’ve seen a clear shift in how major miners and developers are structuring their capital projects - moving between EPCM (Engineering, Procurement and Construction Management) and EPC (Engineering, Procurement and Construction) models depending on project scale, risk appetite and delivery strategy.

But what does this shift really mean for the people behind these projects - the engineers, planners, contracts professionals and project controllers who bring them to life?

EPCM Vs EPC: A Quick Refresher

  • EPCM: The client retains overall responsibility for the project, with the EPCM contractor managing design, procurement and construction on their behalf. This model offers greater flexibility and control for the client and allows for direct engagement with key suppliers and contractors.

  • EPC: The contractor takes on the full design and build responsibility under a lump-sum or fixed-price contract, delivering a complete project on a “turnkey” basis. This model can reduce client risk exposure, but limits flexibility once execution begins.

What’s Changing in 2025

Traditionally, EPCM has been the dominant model for large-scale mining developments in Australia. However, recent years have seen a blend of both approaches emerge across the sector. Several factors are driving this shift:

  • Rising project complexity particularly in brownfield expansions and decarbonisation projects, which require more integrated planning and schedule flexibility.

  • Cost pressures leading some clients to prefer EPC structures that lock in pricing earlier.

  • Resource constraints where companies lean on EPCM delivery to retain control of key decisions amid talent shortages.

  • Decentralised project portfolios especially in lithium, rare earths and energy transition projects, where owners want tighter oversight and scalability.

The Hiring Implications

As delivery models evolve, so too do the skills in demand:

EPCM Projects

  • Greater demand for client-side project controls, contracts and procurement professionals.

  • Interface management and stakeholder coordination become critical skill sets.

  • Systems experience (like P6, Prism, or SAP) and governance expertise are highly sought after.

 EPC Projects

  • Contractors are seeking construction-focused schedulers, estimators, and quantity surveyors who can manage risk under lump-sum conditions.

  • Commercial acumen is vital; professionals who can navigate fixed-price contracts and delivery accountability.

  • There’s also increased demand for hands-on project engineers who can drive execution under tighter program controls.

What This Means for Jobseekers and Employers

For engineers and technical professionals, understanding where the market is heading can help you position your experience effectively, whether you thrive in flexible, client-side EPCM environments or fast-paced EPC delivery roles.

For employers, it’s about recognising that the right delivery model influences your talent strategy. The skills, systems and mindsets required to succeed under each are distinct, and the best outcomes come from aligning your hiring approach early in project planning.

In closing, Australia’s mining sector continues to mature, and delivery models will keep evolving alongside it. Whether EPCM or EPC, one thing remains consistent: people are at the centre of successful project delivery.

At Titan Recruitment, we partner with both owners and contractors across these delivery models, connecting the right professionals with the right projects, and ensuring teams are built for success from the outset. Get in touch with our team to find out how we can support your career goals or search current engineering and technology jobs.

Latest News &
Industry Insights.

​Exclusive to our client edition of the Titan Insight newsletter.